Francis v. Francis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Francis v. Francis

828 S.W.2d 741, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 755

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Francis v. Francis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 5, 1992·No. No. 60344·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the motion court’s order granting wife attorney’s fees on appeal. The motion court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the motion court’s order granting wife attorney’s fees on appeal. The motion court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Francis v. Francis, 828 S.W.2d 741, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 755 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

828 S.W.2d 741 (Francis v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related