Francis v. DOLLAR RENT a CAR SYSTEMS INC.

37 So. 3d 264, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3375, 2009 WL 275188
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2009
Docket5D08-856
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 So. 3d 264 (Francis v. DOLLAR RENT a CAR SYSTEMS INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis v. DOLLAR RENT a CAR SYSTEMS INC., 37 So. 3d 264, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3375, 2009 WL 275188 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joseph “Roy” Francis, has moved the court to certify in accordance with rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, that its decision passes upon the following question of great public importance:

DOES THE GRAVES AMENDMENT, 49 U.S.C § 30106, PREEMPT SECTION 324.021(9) (B) (2), FLORIDA STATUTES (2007)?

As this is the same question certified by this court in Karling v. Budget Rent A Car System, 2 So.3d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); and by the Second District Court of Appeal in West v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 997 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), and by the Fourth District in Tocha v. Richardson, 995 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), and Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 993 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), we grant the motion and certify the question to the Supreme Court of Florida.

QUESTION CERTIFIED.

MONACO, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durkin v. State
37 So. 3d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 So. 3d 264, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3375, 2009 WL 275188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-dollar-rent-a-car-systems-inc-fladistctapp-2009.