Francis v. Cleveland Drug Co.

55 S.E.2d 499, 230 N.C. 753, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 444
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 19, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff went to defendant’s drug store to get a prescription filled. "While waiting, he saw someone, not an employee of defendant, go to a refrigerator in a small storage room adjoining the prescription room and get a Coca-Cola. He went to the refrigerator and got one for himself. After drinking the Coca-Cola he undertook to place the empty bottle on a shelf in the room near an open stairway leading to the basement. In so doing, he fell into the open stairway and suffered certain personal injuries. The room was not open for the accommodation of customers and plaintiff was not invited therein by defendant. Upon this state of facts the judgment must be affirmed on authority of Clark v. Drug Co., 204 N.C. 628, 169 S.E. 217, and Wilson v. Dowtin, 215 N.C. 547, 2 S.E. 2d 576.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis v. Cleveland Drug Co., 55 S.E.2d 499, 230 N.C. 753, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 444 (N.C. 1949).

55 S.E.2d 499 (Francis v. Cleveland Drug Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melton v. Olenik
664 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008)
Cobb v. Clark
143 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Williams v. Stumpf
90 S.E.2d 688 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)