Francis v. Cambra
This text of 73 F. App'x 278 (Francis v. Cambra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We expand the certifícate of appealability to encompass the issue of whether Francis exhausted his claims that his Sixth Amendment rights to an impartial jury and to a unanimous jury were violated. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1. Francis fairly presented these claims in his state appeals by citing federal case law. See Lyons v. Crawford, 232 F.3d 666, 670 (9th Cir.2000), as amended by 247 F.3d 904 (9th Cir.2001). Francis’s claims are therefore exhausted.
We reverse the district court’s dismissal without prejudice and remand for further proceedings consistent with out holding.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F. App'x 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-cambra-ca9-2003.