Francis v. Blaikie Group
This text of 177 F. App'x 121 (Francis v. Blaikie Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Helen Francis, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Marrero, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated June 6, 2005. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s Decision and Order, Francis’s complaint was properly dismissed because her claims are time-barred. An independent evaluation of the record and relevant case law reveals no errors in the District Court’s decision to dismiss Francis’s claims.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-blaikie-group-ca2-2006.