Francis v. Blaikie Group

Second Circuit

Francis v. Blaikie Group

177 F. App'x 121

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 18, 2006·No. No. 05-5396·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Helen Francis, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Marrero, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated June 6, 2005. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s Decision and Order, Francis’s complaint was properly dismissed because her claims are time-barred. An independent evaluation of the record and relevant case law reveals no errors in the District Court’s decision to dismiss Francis’s claims.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Helen Francis, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Marrero, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated June 6, 2005. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s Decision and Order, Francis’s complaint was properly dismissed because her claims are time-barred. An independent evaluation of the record and relevant case law reveals no errors in the District Court’s decision to dismiss Francis’s claims.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Francis v. Blaikie Group, 177 F. App'x 121 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

177 F. App'x 121 (Francis v. Blaikie Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.