Francis v. Administrators of Lathrope
2 Tyl. 372
Opinion
And now on motion, the Court allowed the appellant a day to file his declaration with the Clerk of the Court, under a rule that he should pay the administrators their costs, and tax no costs at this term, in case he eventually prevailed in the suit, and that he should at a day prescribed, serve the administrators with a copy of his declaration.
Cause continued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francis v. Administrators of Lathrope, 2 Tyl. 372 (Vt. 1803).
2 Tyl. 372 (Francis v. Administrators of Lathrope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Carleton
187 A. 423 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1936)
In Re Partridge's Estate
144 A. 861 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1929)
Thorp v. Thorp's Estate
52 A. 1051 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1902)
Cutting v. Estate of Ellis
67 Vt. 70 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1894)
Brown v. Brown
66 Vt. 76 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1894)
Maughan v. Estate of Burns
64 Vt. 316 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1892)