Francis Noel Hines v. Sargent Pitcher
This text of 440 F.2d 792 (Francis Noel Hines v. Sargent Pitcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an order of the District Court denying his pro se petition to enjoin Louisiana authorities from prosecuting him. We affirm.
This case is ripe for dismissal. If the plaintiff’s characterization of this matter as an injunction against Louisiana officials is accepted, then the appellant’s failure to file a brief warrants dismissal under Local Rule 9(b). If the matter is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, May v. Georgia, 409 *793 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1969), then the lack of a certificate of probable cause requires dismissal. McFrederick v. Florida, 261 F.2d 52 (5th Cir. 1958).
Nevertheless, we have examined the entire record. The allegations of the petition are wholly insufficient to support a claim of denial of a speedy trial as recognized by Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374, 89 S.Ct. 575, 21 L.Ed.2d 607 (1969); Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1564, 26 L.Ed.2d 26 (1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F.2d 792, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-noel-hines-v-sargent-pitcher-ca5-1971.