Francis Malouf v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 472 F. App'x 721 (Francis Malouf v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Francis Salem Michael Malouf, a native of Palestine and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Malouf s motion to reopen where Malouf failed to demonstrate materially changed circumstances in Jordan. See Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004) (“The critical question is ... whether circumstances have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution.”); Matter of A-N & R-M-N, 22 I. & N. Dec. 953, 954 (BIA 1999) (an alien who has not shown reasonable cause for his absence from his removal hearing must show materially changed circumstances for a motion to reopen to be granted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F. App'x 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-malouf-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.