Francis Jacob Young v. United States
385 F.2d 417, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510
This text of 385 F.2d 417 (Francis Jacob Young v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Francis Jacob Young v. United States, 385 F.2d 417, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510 (9th Cir. 1967).
Opinion
We have examined the record in the light of the specifications of error and briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction, and no prejudicial error occurred.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
385 F.2d 417, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-jacob-young-v-united-states-ca9-1967.