Francis Jacob Young v. United States

385 F.2d 417, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1967·No. 21287_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the record in the light of the specifications of error and briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction, and no prejudicial error occurred.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis Jacob Young v. United States, 385 F.2d 417, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510 (9th Cir. 1967).

385 F.2d 417 (Francis Jacob Young v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.