Francis H. Robinson v. J. J. Clark, Warden, No. 71-1808 Summary Calendar. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

446 F.2d 1399
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1971
Docket1399
StatusPublished

This text of 446 F.2d 1399 (Francis H. Robinson v. J. J. Clark, Warden, No. 71-1808 Summary Calendar. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis H. Robinson v. J. J. Clark, Warden, No. 71-1808 Summary Calendar. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 446 F.2d 1399 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

446 F.2d 1399

Francis H. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
J. J. CLARK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-1808 Summary Calendar.*
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1971, Rehearing Denied Sept. 22, 1971.

Francis H. Robinson, pro se.

William Stafford, U.S. Atty., C. W. Eggart, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the motion of a federal prisoner brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 2255. We affirm.

Appellant is serving a five year sentence for conspiracy to violate the federal tax statutes regulating distillation of alcoholic beverages. In his 2255 motion he alleged that information furnished to obtain a search warrant was obtained by trespass. Appellant was arrested when officers, making a search pursuant to the warrant, discovered an illicit still on the premises searched.

The district court found from the trial transcript that no trespass occurred. This finding is amply supported.

Since the record and files conclusively refute appellant's allegations, the district court did not err in denying relief without an evidentiary hearing. 28 U.S.C.A. 2255; Helpman v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 373 F.2d 401; Barrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 302 F.2d 151.

Affirmed.

---------------

*(1) Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 F.2d 1399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-h-robinson-v-j-j-clark-warden-no-71-1808-summary-calendar-ca5-1971.