Francis Charlene Golston A/K/A Charlene Davenport v. State of Texas
This text of Francis Charlene Golston A/K/A Charlene Davenport v. State of Texas (Francis Charlene Golston A/K/A Charlene Davenport v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Francis Charlene Golston, a/k/a Charlene L. Davenport, appeals her conviction for theft of money in an amount over $1,500.00. The trial court sentenced her to two years' confinement in a state jail facility. The record reflects that Davenport pleaded guilty before the court without a plea agreement. Davenport was represented by appointed counsel.
Davenport was tried simultaneously on two separate prosecutions and has appealed from both convictions. The same issues raised in this case were also raised in a companion case, No. 06-01-00030-CR, which has been decided this date.
For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the judgment in this case is likewise affirmed.
Donald R. Ross
Justice
Date Submitted: January 11, 2002
Date Decided: January 30, 2002
Do Not Publish
="sotseal3.gif" width="139" height="137" border="0">
______________________________
No. 06-06-00145-CR
CHARLES ANISON ROGERS, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court
Franklin County, Texas
Trial Court No. F7887
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Charles Anison Rogers, Jr., appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(c) (Vernon 2003). His sixty-year sentence was imposed March 23, 2006. Rogers timely filed a motion for new trial April 21, 2006.
According to Rule 26.2, after Rogers timely filed his motion for new trial, he had ninety days after the date sentence was imposed to file a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). Rogers had until June 21, 2006, to file a notice of appeal. He did not, however, file his notice of appeal until June 28, 2006. No motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Hence, this appeal is untimely, and we are without jurisdiction to hear this case.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: July 31, 2006
Date Decided: August 1, 2006
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Francis Charlene Golston A/K/A Charlene Davenport v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-charlene-golston-aka-charlene-davenport-v--texapp-2002.