Francis and Roberta Fugate v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Francis and Roberta Fugate v. United States

386 F.2d 188, 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5786, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1967

Docket24368

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 386 F.2d 188 (Francis and Roberta Fugate v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francis and Roberta Fugate v. United States, 386 F.2d 188, 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5786, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court held that appellants were not entitled to a refund of income taxes. Fugate v. United States, W.D. Tex., 1966, 259 F.Supp. 398. The refund was claimed on the basis of the deduction of the expenses of an European trip taken by taxpayers as expenses incurred in obtaining education under Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and *189 the Treasury Regulations then in existence.

The issue before the District Court depended on the status of appellants as school teachers and the nexus of their occupation to the trip. We have considered the case in light of the amendment to Section 1.162-5 of the Regulations, published on May 1, 1967, and after the case was decided in the District Court.

We are of the view that the findings of fact entered by the District Court are not clearly erroneous and that the conclusions of law are adequately based.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI