Franceschi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Franceschi v. State

604 So. 2d 25, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8950, 1992 WL 197737

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 18, 1992

DocketNo. 92-352

StatusPublished

This text of 604 So. 2d 25 (Franceschi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franceschi v. State, 604 So. 2d 25, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8950, 1992 WL 197737 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. We affirm.

The state presented evidence that Detective Rodney Clayton, while driving home from work, was stopped at a red light when the defendant approached the officer, drew a gun and threatened to kill him. Clayton backed his car out of the way and radioed for assistance. The defendant got in his car and fled. Clayton followed. Thereafter, the two responding police units spotted defendant’s car and ordered him to pull over.

Following procedures for a high-risk stop, Officer Ray ordered defendant out of the car. The trial testimony of Officer Ray indicates that while the defendant was getting out of the car, before the defendant was subdued, and before the pat-down where defendant’s pistol was confiscated, the defendant again threatened Detective Clayton, who was standing nearby:

Q: Officer, at the scene when you stopped the defendant and commanded him, he was commanded out of the car, was he making any statement?

A: He was very loud and very boisterous at the time, yes.

Q: What was he saying?

A: He was pointing at Detective Clayton, he was pointing his finger and kept say: “I’m going to kill the nigger.”

We conclude the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the instant conviction. When Detective Clayton followed in pursuit of the defendant, the detective was engaged in the exercise of police authority. See Taylor v. State, 410 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 418 So.2d 1281 (Fla.1982); Hughes v. State, 400 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla.1981). The stop was made in a manner which demonstrated the officers’ fear that violence was imminent. Thus, the defendant’s threat to kill the detective, at a time when the defendant was not subdued and still had possession of his weapon, constituted an assault upon an officer engaged in the lawful performance of his duties. Soverino v. State, 356 So.2d 269 (Fla.1978); § 784.07(2), Fla.Stat. (1991).

Accordingly, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. We affirm.

The state presented evidence that Detective Rodney Clayton, while driving home from work, was stopped at a red light when the defendant approached the officer, drew a gun and threatened to kill him. Clayton backed his car out of the way and radioed for assistance. The defendant got in his car and fled. Clayton followed. Thereafter, the two responding police units spotted defendant’s car and ordered him to pull over.

Following procedures for a high-risk stop, Officer Ray ordered defendant out of the car. The trial testimony of Officer Ray indicates that while the defendant was getting out of the car, before the defendant was subdued, and before the pat-down where defendant’s pistol was confiscated, the defendant again threatened Detective Clayton, who was standing nearby:

Q: Officer, at the scene when you stopped the defendant and commanded him, he was commanded out of the car, was he making any statement?

A: He was very loud and very boisterous at the time, yes.

Q: What was he saying?

A: He was pointing at Detective Clayton, he was pointing his finger and kept say: “I’m going to kill the nigger.”

We conclude the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the instant conviction. When Detective Clayton followed in pursuit of the defendant, the detective was engaged in the exercise of police authority. See Taylor v. State, 410 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 418 So.2d 1281 (Fla.1982); Hughes v. State, 400 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla.1981). The stop was made in a manner which demonstrated the officers’ fear that violence was imminent. Thus, the defendant’s threat to kill the detective, at a time when the defendant was not subdued and still had possession of his weapon, constituted an assault upon an officer engaged in the lawful performance of his duties. Soverino v. State, 356 So.2d 269 (Fla.1978); § 784.07(2), Fla.Stat. (1991).

Accordingly, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

604 So. 2d 25, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8950, 1992 WL 197737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franceschi-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack