Francesca Scanio Stacey v. Selina Shadd
This text of Francesca Scanio Stacey v. Selina Shadd (Francesca Scanio Stacey v. Selina Shadd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2020
NO. 03-20-00126-CV
Francesca Scanio Stacey, Appellant
v.
Selina Shadd, Appellee
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH
This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 30, 2020. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
trial court’s order but that there was an abuse of discretion that requires correction. Therefore,
the Court modifies the trial court’s order to eliminate the imposition of sanctions. Because the
provisions of the order sealing the disputed records are unchallenged on appeal, the Court
affirms the order as modified. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this
Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Francesca Scanio Stacey v. Selina Shadd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francesca-scanio-stacey-v-selina-shadd-texapp-2020.