Francesca Gregorini v. Apple Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedNovember 9, 2022
Docket2:20-cv-00406
StatusUnknown

This text of Francesca Gregorini v. Apple Inc. (Francesca Gregorini v. Apple Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francesca Gregorini v. Apple Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-00406-SSS-JC Document 103 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1037

1 NICOLAS A. JAMPOL (State Bar No. 244867) nicolasjampol@dwt.com 2 CYDNEY SWOFFORD FREEMAN (State Bar No. 315766) cydneyfreeman@dwt.com 3 MEENAKSHI KRISHNAN (pro hac vice) meenakshikrishnan@dwt.com 4 SAMANTHA LACHMAN (State Bar No. 331969) samlachman@dwt.com 5 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 24th Floor 6 Los Angeles, California 90017-2566 Tel.: (213) 633-6800; Fax: (213) 633-6899 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 DAVID ALDEN ERIKSON (State Bar No. 189838) 9 david@daviderikson.com ANTOINETTE WALLER (State Bar No. 152895) 10 antoinette@daviderikson.com JEFFREY J. MILES (SBN 293869) 11 jeff@daviderikson.com ERIKSON LAW GROUP 12 200 North Larchmont Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90004 13 Tel.: 323.465.3100; Fax: 323.465.3177

14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16

FRANCESCA GREGORINI, Case No. 2:20-cv-00406-SSS-JC 17

Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 18 ORDER vs. 19 [CHANGES MADE BY COURT TO APPLE INC., a California corporation; PARAGRAPHS 4(A), 10(A), 12(B)] 20 M. NIGHT SHYAMALAN, an individual, BLINDING EDGE 21 PICTURES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; UNCLE GEORGE 22 PRODUCTIONS, a Pennsylvania corporate; ESCAPE ARTISTS LLC, a 23 California limited liability company; DOLPHIN BLACK PRODUCTIONS, a 24 California corporation; TONY BASGALLOP, an individual; ASHWIN 25 RAJAN, an individual; JASON BLUMENTHAL, an individual; TODD 26 BLACK, an individual; STEVE TISCH, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 27

Defendants. 28

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4889-8547-7949v.1 0113237-000003 Case 2: 20-cv-00406-SSS-JC Document 103 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 18 Page ID #:1038

1 Plaintiff Francesca Gregorini (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Blinding Edge 2 Pictures, Inc., Uncle George Productions, LLC, Apple Inc., Escape Artists, Inc. 3 (erroneously sued as Escape Artists LLC), Dolphin Black Productions, M. Night 4 Shyamalan, Tony Basgallop, Ashwin Rajan, Jason Blumenthal, Todd Black, and 5 Steve Tisch (collectively, “Defendants”) anticipate that documents, testimony, or 6 information containing or reflecting confidential, proprietary, trade secret, and/or 7 commercially sensitive information are likely to be disclosed or produced during 8 the course of discovery, initial disclosures, and supplemental disclosures in this 9 case and request that the Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions for 10 treating, obtaining, and using such information. 11 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds 12 good cause for the following Agreed Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and 13 Use of Discovery Materials (“Order” or “Protective Order”). 14 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 15 (a) Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order 16 shall be used by a Receiving Party solely for this case, and shall not be used directly 17 or indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever. 18 (b) The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 19 protections on all disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or 20 supplemental disclosures under Rule 26(a). Designations under this Order shall be 21 made with care and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated 22 material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it comes to a Producing Party’s 23 attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at all, or does not 24 qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Producing Party must 25 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. 26 2. DEFINITIONS 27 (a) “Discovery Material” means all items or information, including from 28 any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained 1 S 48T 8I 9P -8U 54L 7A -7T 94E 9D v.1 P 0R 11O 32T 3E 7-C 00T 0I 0V 03E ORDER Case 2: 20-cv-00406-SSS-JC Document 103 Filed 11/09/22 Page 3 of 18 Page ID #:1039

1 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are 2 produced, disclosed, or generated in connection with discovery or Rule 26(a) 3 disclosures in this case. 4 (b) “Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the 5 pleadings as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, and staff of such counsel 6 to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation. 7 (c) “Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, 8 directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel and their 9 support staffs. 10 (d) “Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or 11 produces any Discovery Material in this case. 12 (e) “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated 13 as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as 14 provided for in this Order. Protected Material shall not include: (i) advertising 15 materials that have been actually published or publicly disseminated; and (ii) 16 materials that show on their face they have been disseminated to the public. 17 (f) “Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material 18 from a Producing Party. 19 3. COMPUTATION OF TIME 20 The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order 21 shall be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rules of 22 Civil Procedure 6. 23 4. SCOPE 24 (a) The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery 25 Material governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied 26 or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations 27 thereof, plus deposition testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their 28 Counsel that might reveal Protected Material, other than during a court hearing or at 2 S 48T 8I 9P -8U 54L 7A -7T 94E 9D v.1 P 0R 11O 32T 3E 7-C 00T 0I 0V 03E ORDER Case 2: 20-cv-00406-SSS-JC Document 103 Filed 11/09/22 Page 4 of 18 Page ID #:1040

1 trial. Any use of Protected Material during a court hearing or at trial shall be governed 2 by the orders of the presiding judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected 3 Material during a court hearing or at trial. 4 (b) Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing 5 Party’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and 6 nothing in this Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected 7 Material to an individual who prepared the Protected Material. 8 (c) Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to 9 use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the 10 Producing Party or by order of the Court. 11 (d) This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further 12 or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any 13 way, including, without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at 14 all. 15 5. DURATION 16 Even after the termination of this case, the confidentiality obligations imposed 17 by this Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party agrees otherwise in writing 18 or a court order otherwise directs. 19 6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 20 (a) Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used solely for this case 21 or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, 22 including without limitation any other litigation, patent prosecution or acquisition, 23 patent reexamination or reissue proceedings, or any business or competitive purpose 24 or function.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Francesca Gregorini v. Apple Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francesca-gregorini-v-apple-inc-cacd-2022.