Frances Schuster Schaffner v. John H. Bingler, Director of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit

Frances Schuster Schaffner v. John H. Bingler, Director of Internal Revenue

268 F.2d 76, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1384, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3911

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 7, 1959

Docket12795

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 268 F.2d 76 (Frances Schuster Schaffner v. John H. Bingler, Director of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frances Schuster Schaffner v. John H. Bingler, Director of Internal Revenue, 268 F.2d 76, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1384, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3911 (3d Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to enjoin the taxing authorities from collecting the tax due under a final decision of the Tax Court. The order of the Tax Court determining that appellant was liable for the income taxes involved was entered with the consent of appellant. No petition for review of that decision was ever filed. We think Section 7421 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S. C.A. § 7421, providing that no suit shall be maintained in any court to restrain the assessment or collection of any tax *77 or transferee liability, is clearly applicable in this instance. And here where the jurisdiction of the Tax Court was properly invoked and its decision having become final, the district court has no jurisdiction to reopen that decision. Lasky v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 97, affirmed per curiam, 1957, 352 U.S. 1027, 77 S.Ct. 594, 1 L.Ed.2d 598; White’s Will v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 746.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to enjoin the taxing authorities from collecting the tax due under a final decision of the Tax Court. The order of the Tax Court determining that appellant was liable for the income taxes involved was entered with the consent of appellant. No petition for review of that decision was ever filed. We think Section 7421 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S. C.A. § 7421, providing that no suit shall be maintained in any court to restrain the assessment or collection of any tax *77 or transferee liability, is clearly applicable in this instance. And here where the jurisdiction of the Tax Court was properly invoked and its decision having become final, the district court has no jurisdiction to reopen that decision. Lasky v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 97, affirmed per curiam, 1957, 352 U.S. 1027, 77 S.Ct. 594, 1 L.Ed.2d 598; White’s Will v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 746.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 F.2d 76, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1384, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frances-schuster-schaffner-v-john-h-bingler-director-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack