Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation

Fourth Circuit

Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation

407 F.2d 403

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1969

Docket12808

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 403 (Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 407 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Allied Chemical Corporation, the defendant below, moved for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the District Court had no jurisdiction because the plaintiff was restricted to the exclusive remedy created by the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act. The District Court denied the motion, authorizing an appeal from its interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). For the reasons stated by the District Court, its denial of the motion is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Allied Chemical Corporation, the defendant below, moved for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the District Court had no jurisdiction because the plaintiff was restricted to the exclusive remedy created by the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act. The District Court denied the motion, authorizing an appeal from its interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). For the reasons stated by the District Court, its denial of the motion is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 F.2d 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frances-ritter-v-allied-chemical-corporation-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack