Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation
407 F.2d 403
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1969·No. 12808·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Allied Chemical Corporation, the defendant below, moved for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the District Court had no jurisdiction because the plaintiff was restricted to the exclusive remedy created by the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act. The District Court denied the motion, authorizing an appeal from its interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). For the reasons stated by the District Court, its denial of the motion is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 407 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1969).
407 F.2d 403 (Frances Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patterson v. Augat Wiring Systems, Inc.
944 F. Supp. 1509 (M.D. Alabama, 1996)
Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.
552 So. 2d 1099 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Ford v. Revlon, Inc.
734 P.2d 580 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1987)
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.
469 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Summers v. Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.
479 P.2d 292 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1970)