Frances Nave v. Merck & Company

Eighth Circuit

Frances Nave v. Merck & Company

5 F. App'x 573

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 2001

Docket00-2110

StatusUnpublished

This text of 5 F. App'x 573 (Frances Nave v. Merck & Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frances Nave v. Merck & Company, 5 F. App'x 573 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Frances Nave appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants for the reasons discussed in its order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Frances Nave appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants for the reasons discussed in its order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F. App'x 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frances-nave-v-merck-company-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack