Frances Leon Parrish v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company

184 F.2d 185
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 15, 1950·No. 12490·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM. '

Appellant sought judgment in the District Court for the sum of $10,000 as beneficiary under a policy of insurance issued by appellee to her husband. After trial by jury a verdict was rendered in favor of appellant.

On motion of appellee the trial court granted judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict.

In granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the court filed a written opinion in which it set out at length and in detail the reasoning upon which it based its judgment.

We think the trial court reached the correct conclusion and we adopt the reasoning expressed in its opinion, D4C., 92 F. Supp. 300.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frances Leon Parrish v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company, 184 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1950).

184 F.2d 185 (Frances Leon Parrish v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related