Frances Ju v. Kelly Service, Inc.

508 F. App'x 659
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2013·No. 11-36067·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Frances Du Ju appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her employment discrimination action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and state law. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Ju failed to appeal within 30 days of November 7, 2011, the date the district court entered judgment in a minute order that sufficiently satisfied the separate document requirement of Rule 58 of the Fed *660 eral Rules of Civil Procedure. See Ingram v. ACandS, Inc., 977 F.2d 1332, 1338-39 (9th Cir.1992). Accordingly, Ju’s appeal is untimely and we lack jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(7)(A)(ii).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frances Ju v. Kelly Service, Inc., 508 F. App'x 659 (9th Cir. 2013).

508 F. App'x 659 (Frances Ju v. Kelly Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingram v. Acands, Inc.
977 F.2d 1332 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)