Frances De Crignis Von Wedel v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian

Third Circuit

Frances De Crignis Von Wedel v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian

194 F.2d 1013, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2896

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 25, 1952

Docket10648

StatusPublished

This text of 194 F.2d 1013 (Frances De Crignis Von Wedel v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frances De Crignis Von Wedel v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, 194 F.2d 1013, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2896 (3d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

194 F.2d 1013

Frances De Crignis VON WEDEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. Howard McGRATH, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10648.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 21, 1952.

Decided March 25, 1952.

Appeal from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Thomas F. Meaney, Judge.

Chauncey Belknap, New York City (Milton, McNulty & Augelli, Jersey City, N. J., Robert P. Patterson, Pieter J. Kooiman, Francis J. Sypher, all of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Irving Jaffe, Washington, D. C. (Harold I. Baynton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Grover C. Richman, Jr., U. S. Atty., for District of New Jersey, Newark, N. J., Edward V. Ryan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jersey City, N. J., James D. Hill, George B. Searls, Washington, D. C., Sol Elson, Attorneys Department of Justice, on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Meaney in the District Court. 100 F.Supp. 434.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI