Franasiak v. Moldenhauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Franasiak v. Moldenhauer

8 A.D.2d 685, 184 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 685 (Franasiak v. Moldenhauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franasiak v. Moldenhauer, 8 A.D.2d 685, 184 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: We find the amount of the verdict rendered by the jury inadequate under the facts presented in the record. All concur. (Appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of Niagara Trial Term, for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Kimball, J. P., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: We find the amount of the verdict rendered by the jury inadequate under the facts presented in the record. All concur. (Appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of Niagara Trial Term, for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Kimball, J. P., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 685, 184 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franasiak-v-moldenhauer-nyappdiv-1959.