Frampton v. State Building Commission

West Virginia Court of Claims

Frampton v. State Building Commission

15 Ct. Cl. 271

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 1, 1985

DocketCC-84-221

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 271 (Frampton v. State Building Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frampton v. State Building Commission, 15 Ct. Cl. 271 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for an advisory determination pursuant to W. Va. Code §14-2-18. Claimant, an architect, supplied respondent with architectural plans for the renovation of respondent’s headquarters in Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia. Claimant’s fee for the work amounted to $12,236.80. No payment has been made to claimant because the established purchasing procedures were not technically complied with. Renovation work on the building is 90% complete; however, due to inclement weather, completion of the project has been postponed. Respondent has requested that the Court issue this advisory opinion to authorize payment of $11,013.12, or 90% of the total claim at this time. There are ■ sufficient funds in respondent’s appropriation in the current fiscal year from which the claim could be paid. Respondent will request payment of the remaining $1,223.68 upon completion of the project.

[272]*272In view of the foregoing, the Court hereby finds respondent liable to the claimant in the amount of $11,013.12. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this opinion and transmit a copy to claimant and respondent agency.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for an advisory determination pursuant to W. Va. Code §14-2-18. Claimant, an architect, supplied respondent with architectural plans for the renovation of respondent’s headquarters in Charleston, Kanawha County, West Virginia. Claimant’s fee for the work amounted to $12,236.80. No payment has been made to claimant because the established purchasing procedures were not technically complied with. Renovation work on the building is 90% complete; however, due to inclement weather, completion of the project has been postponed. Respondent has requested that the Court issue this advisory opinion to authorize payment of $11,013.12, or 90% of the total claim at this time. There are ■ sufficient funds in respondent’s appropriation in the current fiscal year from which the claim could be paid. Respondent will request payment of the remaining $1,223.68 upon completion of the project.

[272]*272In view of the foregoing, the Court hereby finds respondent liable to the claimant in the amount of $11,013.12. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this opinion and transmit a copy to claimant and respondent agency.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ct. Cl. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frampton-v-state-building-commission-wvctcl-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack