Frame v. Hudspeth
309 U.S. 632, 60 S. Ct. 712
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for certiorari is also granted, and, upon consent of the Solicitor General, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for the purpose of making a full inquiry into the mental status of the petitioner at the time he entered- the pleas of guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frame v. Hudspeth, 309 U.S. 632, 60 S. Ct. 712 (1940).
309 U.S. 632 (Frame v. Hudspeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Santobello v. New York
404 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1971)
United States v. William C. Smith
440 F.2d 521 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
Smith v. People
428 P.2d 69 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1967)
Cecil Marvin Hurt v. United States
327 F.2d 978 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
Robert Wilburn Fisher v. United States
317 F.2d 352 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
313 F.2d 934 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Rephael K. Hartman v. United States
310 F.2d 447 (Sixth Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Harold Wayne Davis
302 F.2d 427 (Sixth Circuit, 1962)
Byrd v. Pescor
163 F.2d 775 (Eighth Circuit, 1947)
Robinson v. Johnston
118 F.2d 998 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)