Frame v. Felix

31 A. 375, 167 Pa. 47, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 860
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 18, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 340
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 31 A. 375 (Frame v. Felix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frame v. Felix, 31 A. 375, 167 Pa. 47, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 860 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The important question in this case is raised upon the spec[55]*55ifications forming part of the proposed contract for the new inlet and pumping station about to be built by the water department of the city of Reading. These specifications require the contractor to employ no one not a citizen of the United States and to pay no man a less sum for his labor than one dollar anc] a half per day. The point made by the plaintiff is that such specifications are not consistent with the provisions of the act of May 23, 1889, art. 4, sec. 6, which require that such work shall be let to the lowest responsible bidder. The learned judge of the court below in his findings of law marked a, b, c and d, has sustained the contention of the plaintiff and fully vindicated his decree. We affirm it for the reasons so clearly stated in these findings. The question discussed in the remainder of the opinion affecting the organization of the water department defendant, is not raised by the assignments of error and we express no opinion upon it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gleim v. Bear
616 A.2d 1064 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Rocks v. City of Philadelphia
868 F.2d 644 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Philson v. City of Omaha
93 N.W.2d 13 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1958)
Glassman v. Philadelphia
9 Pa. D. & C.2d 495 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
Naugle v. Vaux
68 Pa. D. & C. 135 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
In re Guardianship of Pickard
2 V.I. 363 (Virgin Islands, 1945)
Reid v. Smith
30 N.E.2d 908 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1940)
Aiken v. Armistead
198 S.E. 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Campbell v. Bellevue Borough School District
195 A. 53 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Capo v. Kane
28 Pa. D. & C. 535 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Mayor of Baltimore v. Employers' Ass'n of Maryland, Inc.
159 A. 267 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
Bohn v. Salt Lake City
8 P.2d 591 (Utah Supreme Court, 1932)
Asplund v. Hannett
249 P. 1074 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1926)
Page v. King
131 A. 707 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Gilseth v. Risty
193 N.W. 132 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Kay v. Sagerdahl
1 Pa. D. & C. 110 (Warren County Court of Common Pleas, 1921)
Taylor v. Philadelphia
104 A. 766 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
McKay-Smith v. Philadelphia
54 Pa. Super. 257 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
State ex rel. Miller v. Hall
141 N.W. 124 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Malette v. City of Spokane
123 P. 1005 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A. 375, 167 Pa. 47, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frame-v-felix-pa-1895.