Fralix v. Bakule
This text of 464 So. 2d 711 (Fralix v. Bakule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the main appeal but reverse the denial of attorney’s fees raised as an issue on cross appeal. See Florida Medical Center, Inc. v. Von Stetina, 436 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). On the main appeal we do not believe the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial after having exhaustively considered the grounds raised by appellants.
Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment, reverse the order denying attorney’s fees and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 So. 2d 711, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fralix-v-bakule-fladistctapp-1985.