Fralix v. Bakule

464 So. 2d 711, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12944
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1985
DocketNos. 84-232, 84-363
StatusPublished

This text of 464 So. 2d 711 (Fralix v. Bakule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fralix v. Bakule, 464 So. 2d 711, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the main appeal but reverse the denial of attorney’s fees raised as an issue on cross appeal. See Florida Medical Center, Inc. v. Von Stetina, 436 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). On the main appeal we do not believe the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial after having exhaustively considered the grounds raised by appellants.

Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment, reverse the order denying attorney’s fees and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Medical Center, Inc. v. VON STETINA EX REL. VON STETINA
436 So. 2d 1022 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 So. 2d 711, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 659, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fralix-v-bakule-fladistctapp-1985.