Fraley's Appeal
76 Pa. 42, 1874 Pa. LEXIS 146
Opinion
Judgment was entered- in the Supreme Court March 30th 1874.
We think this case is governed by the same principle which ruled the cases of Fisher v. Knox, 1 Harris 626, and Campbell’s Appeal, 5 Casey 402. The practice of delivering a note or bond, upon which judgment is entered by the prothonotary under the Act of 1806, back to the plaintiff is bad and malus usus abolendus est. It should remain on file as the evidence of authority for the judgment and the protection of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fraley's Appeal, 76 Pa. 42, 1874 Pa. LEXIS 146 (Pa. 1874).
76 Pa. 42 (Fraley's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. Gasborro
25 Pa. D. & C. 704 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Longacre v. Breisch
22 Pa. D. & C. 271 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Schwartz v. Stein
12 Pa. D. & C. 638 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)
S. Jacobs Son v. Busedu
95 Pa. Super. 132 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)