Fraley v. March

68 N.C. 160
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Reads, J.

The law of the venue of actions, with reference to the residence of the parties does not govern this case, but the law of the venue with reference to the “subject of the action.” It is substantially an action “ for the foreclosure of a mortgage of real property;” and that must be tried in the county where the land is situate. C. C. P. 66.

No error. Affirmed.

This will be certified.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fraley v. March, 68 N.C. 160 (N.C. 1873).

68 N.C. 160 (Fraley v. March) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penland v. Red Hill Methodist Church
37 S.E.2d 177 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Vaughan v. . Fallin
111 S.E. 513 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Councill v. . Bailey
69 S.E. 760 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Eames v. Armstrong.
48 S.E. 769 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Connor v. Dillard.
39 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)
Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. Brower
11 S.E. 313 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)