Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

659 N.E.2d 1285, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1508, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2964

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1996

Docket96-135

StatusPublished

This text of 659 N.E.2d 1285 (Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fraiberg v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 659 N.E.2d 1285, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1508, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2964 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s request for immediate alternative writ of prohibition,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for immediate alternative writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, granted, effective January 26, 1996, and all proceedings in the trial court in case No. D230590 are stayed, pending final resolution of this cause in this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtJPrac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before February 15, 1996, unless upon good cause shown, the time is extended by the court; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file its brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Moyer, C.J., Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s request for immediate alternative writ of prohibition,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for immediate alternative writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, granted, effective January 26, 1996, and all proceedings in the trial court in case No. D230590 are stayed, pending final resolution of this cause in this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtJPrac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before February 15, 1996, unless upon good cause shown, the time is extended by the court; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file its brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Moyer, C.J., Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 N.E.2d 1285, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1508, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraiberg-v-cuyahoga-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1996.