Fragomeni v. Spaulding
276 A.D.2d 882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 276 A.D.2d 882 (Fragomeni v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fragomeni v. Spaulding, 276 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J. P., and Bergan, J., dissent, for the reasons stated in Matter of Lees v. Spaulding (276 App. Div. 256, decided herewith), and vote to affirm the Special Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fragomeni-v-spaulding-nyappdiv-1949.