Fraga v. Fraga

562 So. 2d 851, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433, 1990 WL 83626
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1990
DocketNos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 562 So. 2d 851 (Fraga v. Fraga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fraga v. Fraga, 562 So. 2d 851, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433, 1990 WL 83626 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

ON APPELLANT’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO RECALL OR ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

On remand the court simply deleted the sentence in Part V of the Amended Final Judgment which provided that it had “taken into consideration, in setting the amount of monthly alimony, tax free monies the wife will be receiving from her share of the equitable distribution of the parties’ property.” In that there will be no tax-free monies from her share of the divided property, equity requires that the $500,000 ten-year payout of Mrs. Fraga’s equitable distribution be at present value and secured by a lien against the former’s husband interest in the Douglas Medical Center.

The cause is remanded with instructions to revise the judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smilack v. Smilack
858 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Rey v. Rey
598 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
562 So. 2d 851, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433, 1990 WL 83626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraga-v-fraga-fladistctapp-1990.