Fraga v. Fraga

562 So. 2d 851, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433, 1990 WL 83626
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1990·No. Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON APPELLANT’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO RECALL OR ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

On remand the court simply deleted the sentence in Part V of the Amended Final Judgment which provided that it had “taken into consideration, in setting the amount of monthly alimony, tax free monies the wife will be receiving from her share of the equitable distribution of the parties’ property.” In that there will be no tax-free monies from her share of the divided property, equity requires that the $500,000 ten-year payout of Mrs. Fraga’s equitable distribution be at present value and secured by a lien against the former’s husband interest in the Douglas Medical Center.

The cause is remanded with instructions to revise the judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fraga v. Fraga, 562 So. 2d 851, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433, 1990 WL 83626 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 851 (Fraga v. Fraga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smilack v. Smilack
858 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Rey v. Rey
598 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)