Fraga v. Fraga

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fraga v. Fraga

555 So. 2d 427, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fraga v. Fraga. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 1989·No. Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant’s receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.

Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant’s receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.

Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Fraga v. Fraga, 555 So. 2d 427, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

555 So. 2d 427 (Fraga v. Fraga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related