Fraga v. Fraga
This text of 555 So. 2d 427 (Fraga v. Fraga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant’s receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.
Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 So. 2d 427, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraga-v-fraga-fladistctapp-1989.