Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

261 A.D. 974, 27 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393

This text of 261 A.D. 974 (Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 261 A.D. 974, 27 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, order denying defendant’s motion, made pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 106, to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or, in the alternative, pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 103, to strike therefrom the allegations of paragraph “ Tenth ” thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 974, 27 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fradkin-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1941.