Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

261 A.D. 974, 27 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1941·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, order denying defendant’s motion, made pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 106, to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or, in the alternative, pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 103, to strike therefrom the allegations of paragraph “ Tenth ” thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, order denying defendant’s motion, made pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 106, to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or, in the alternative, pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 103, to strike therefrom the allegations of paragraph “ Tenth ” thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 261 A.D. 974, 27 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 974 (Fradkin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.