Frade v. Costa

186 N.E.2d 606, 345 Mass. 764, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 950
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 N.E.2d 606 (Frade v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frade v. Costa, 186 N.E.2d 606, 345 Mass. 764, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 950 (Mass. 1962).

Opinion

Order dismissing report affirmed. In amplification of his general finding for the defendants in this action for false arrest, the judge made special [765]*765findings that, after notice by the defendant attorney on behalf of the defendant landowner to the police and to the plaintiff that the latter was not to enter the enclosed locus, the plaintiff deliberately did enter, was arrested by a police officer pursuant to the provisions of G. L. e. 266, § 120, and found guilty; that the plaintiff was in fact a trespasser; and that the arrest was lawful. The plaintiff’s requests for rulings were predicated on facts which were at variance with the facts found by the judge, and were properly denied. No question of law was presented to the Appellate Division and none is presented to us. Kelsey v. Hampton Court Hotel Co. 327 Mass. 150, 152, and cases cited.

Joseph Freitas for the plaintiff. No argument or brief for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Associated Electric Co. v. E. J. Kelley Co.
44 Mass. App. Dec. 1 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E.2d 606, 345 Mass. 764, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frade-v-costa-mass-1962.