Fraccola v. 1st Choice Realty, Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 00566
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2025
Docket859 CA 24-00703
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00566 (Fraccola v. 1st Choice Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fraccola v. 1st Choice Realty, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 00566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Fraccola v 1st Choice Realty, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 00566)
Fraccola v 1st Choice Realty, Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 00566
Decided on January 31, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, GREENWOOD, AND KEANE, JJ.

859 CA 24-00703

[*1]ALBERT G. FRACCOLA, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

1ST CHOICE REALTY, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND HONORABLE RANDAL B. CALDWELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


ALBERT G. FRACCOLA, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ALEXANDRIA TWINEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Mark R. Rose, J.), entered October 26, 2023. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendant Honorable Randal B. Caldwell to dismiss the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff, pro se, appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted the motion of the Honorable Randal B. Caldwell (defendant) to dismiss plaintiff's complaint against him and dismissed the complaint in its entirety. We affirm.

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion and dismissed the complaint. This action is based on subject matter concerning a 2005 stipulation by which plaintiff agreed to settle various lawsuits. As we have previously noted, "courts have issued at least three prior orders prohibiting [plaintiff] from commencing actions based on the subject matter of the 2005 stipulation without prior leave of court" and, here, plaintiff's complaint was filed without leave of court (Fraccola v 1st Choice Realty, Inc., 206 AD3d 1649, 1650 [4th Dept 2022], appeal dismissed 38 NY3d 1155 [2022]; see also Fraccola v 1st Choice Realty, Inc., 224 AD3d 1227, 1228 [4th Dept 2024]). In light of our determination, we need not address plaintiff's remaining contentions.

Entered: January 31, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraccola-v-1st-choice-realty-inc-nyappdiv-2025.