Frabetto v. Camp

City of New York Municipal Court

Frabetto v. Camp

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (Frabetto v. Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frabetto v. Camp, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Newburger, J.

The plaintiff’s hired a plot of ground at Sedgwick avenue and tiie old Boston road, in the city of New York, on which a frame house stood belonging to plaintiffs and occupied the same. During plaintiffs’ absence in the month of September, 1893, plaintiffs’ house was broken into by a number of men, and filled with cement, and the property of plaintiffs’ injured and destroyed. It is claimed that the cement was the property of defendant, and was brought to the house by the agents of defendant, to be used in improvements to the farm on which the house stood. This action is brought to recover damages for such acts on the part of defendant and his agents. A careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any errors. The trial justice properly submitted the case to the jury, and there are no exceptions that would warrant us in disturbing the judgment herein. The judgment must therefore bo affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newburger, J.

The plaintiff’s hired a plot of ground at Sedgwick avenue and tiie old Boston road, in the city of New York, on which a frame house stood belonging to plaintiffs and occupied the same. During plaintiffs’ absence in the month of September, 1893, plaintiffs’ house was broken into by a number of men, and filled with cement, and the property of plaintiffs’ injured and destroyed. It is claimed that the cement was the property of defendant, and was brought to the house by the agents of defendant, to be used in improvements to the farm on which the house stood. This action is brought to recover damages for such acts on the part of defendant and his agents. A careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any errors. The trial justice properly submitted the case to the jury, and there are no exceptions that would warrant us in disturbing the judgment herein. The judgment must therefore bo affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frabetto-v-camp-nynyccityct-1893.