F.R. v. State

122 So. 3d 866, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 661, 2013 WL 5269598, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2018

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in F.R. v. State, 81 So.3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., concurs in result.