Foy's Case

73 A. 324, 224 Pa. 358, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 793
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 1909·No. Appeal, No. 191·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

P. C. Foy, the appellant, was returned to the office of the county commissioners of Schuylkill county as having been nominated in the middle ward of the borough of Girardville at a primary election held on January 18,1908. Exceptions were filed to his nomination February 6 following, which, four days later, were sustained by the court. This appeal is not from the action of the court sustaining the exceptions, but from the refusal to grant a rehearing on the petition of the appellant presented February 24, 1908 — eight days after the election. The single assignment of error is the refusal to rehear the case. On this certiorari we pass only upon the regularity of the record, and as nothing appears from it showing that the court erred or abused its discretion in refusing the rehearing, its action is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foy's Case, 73 A. 324, 224 Pa. 358, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 793 (Pa. 1909).

73 A. 324 (Foy's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenwood Township Election Case
25 A.2d 330 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)