Foye v. State

558 So. 2d 537, 1990 WL 37475
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1990·No. 89-2180·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

558 So.2d 537 (1990)

Irving FOYE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1990.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

As the state concedes, the trial court's imposition of a probationary term, which was not called for in the plea agreement, was unjustified. Simpson v. State, 467 So.2d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Accordingly, the sentence under review is vacated and the cause remanded with directions for the trial court either to impose the sentence agreed upon or permit the appellant to withdraw his plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foye v. State, 558 So. 2d 537, 1990 WL 37475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 537 (Foye v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouie v. State
694 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Dawkins v. State
651 So. 2d 1317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Stocker v. State
564 So. 2d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Perkins
558 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)