Foy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Foy v. State

105 S.E. 657, 26 Ga. App. 205, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 69

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 25, 1921

Docket11970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 657 (Foy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foy v. State, 105 S.E. 657, 26 Ga. App. 205, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 69 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “ The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such clear and strong probative value as to require a charge upon the law of alibi, especially in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request therefor. ” Throckmorton v. State, 23 Ga. App. 112 (3) (97 S. E. 664); Gadlin v. State, 13 Ga. App. 660 (79 S. E. 751).

2! The evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI