Foy v. State
105 S.E. 657, 26 Ga. App. 205, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 69
Opinion
1. “ The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such clear and strong probative value as to require a charge upon the law of alibi, especially in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request therefor. ” Throckmorton v. State, 23 Ga. App. 112 (3) (97 S. E. 664); Gadlin v. State, 13 Ga. App. 660 (79 S. E. 751).
2! The evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foy v. State, 105 S.E. 657, 26 Ga. App. 205, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 69 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
105 S.E. 657 (Foy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
150 S.E. 431 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)