Foy v. Domec

California Supreme Court

Foy v. Domec

33 Cal. 317

California Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

The notice of appeal appears to have been served on the 6th, and filed on the 9th, of February, 1867, and respondents move to dismiss because no effectual appeal has been taken. It has been repeatedly held that to render an appeal effectual, under the statute, the filing must precede, or be cotemporaneous with, the service. (Boston v. Haynes, 31 Cal. 107.)

The appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

The notice of appeal appears to have been served on the 6th, and filed on the 9th, of February, 1867, and respondents move to dismiss because no effectual appeal has been taken. It has been repeatedly held that to render an appeal effectual, under the statute, the filing must precede, or be cotemporaneous with, the service. (Boston v. Haynes, 31 Cal. 107.)

The appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Foy v. Domec, 33 Cal. 317 (Cal. 1867).

Pincite

33 Cal. 317 (Foy v. Domec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related