Foy v. . County of Westchester

61 N.E. 172, 168 N.Y. 180, 6 Bedell 180, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 869
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 1, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 61 N.E. 172 (Foy v. . County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foy v. . County of Westchester, 61 N.E. 172, 168 N.Y. 180, 6 Bedell 180, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 869 (N.Y. 1901).

Opinion

Landon, J.

The statute (Ch. 833, Laws of 1873, as amended by ch. 535 of the Laws of 1874) provides that “a coroner shall have power, when necessary, to employ not more than two competent surgeons to make post mortem examinations and dissections and to testify to the same, the compensation therefor to be a county charge.” Thus the coroner had the power to employ the plaintiff to make the post mortem examinations but not to fix his compensation. The statute makes the compensation a county charge. The complaint alleges that “ the defendant audited and allowed for each of said post mortem examinations the sum of ten dollars,” from which we assume that the plaintiff presented his claim to the board of supervisors, which made the audit. The board had jurisdiction to audit the same, and its audit was final, not having been reviewed or reversed upon certiorari, and was payable at the amount audited by the county treasurer upon plaintiff’s presentation of the proper warrant or certificate of the board of supervisors. It thus appears that the defendant is not charged with a default in legal duty. The allegation that the amount of the audit is not the value of his services ” may state a case for a review of the audit by certiorari, but not a cause of action. ■

The judgment, should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. County of Dupage
20 N.E.2d 40 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1939)
Suhr v. County of Dodge
236 N.W. 463 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)
New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland County
106 N.E. 80 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland County
159 A.D. 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Western New York Institution for Deaf Mutes v. County of Broome
82 Misc. 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.E. 172, 168 N.Y. 180, 6 Bedell 180, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foy-v-county-of-westchester-ny-1901.