Foy v. Bank of America Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1324

RICHARD C. FOY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; ELIZABETH H. WHITSEL; KEN LEWIS; CAMEY P. MCMASTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cv-00944-FL)

Submitted: May 4, 2007 Decided: June 6, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pyle Dion, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Foy appeals the district court’s orders

granting the individual defendants’ motions to dismiss his Title

VII, malicious discharge, and defamation claims, denying Foy’s

motion for summary judgment, and granting summary judgment to

Defendants Whitsel and Bank of America Corporation on Foy’s claims

of hostile work environment, sex discrimination, retaliation,

malicious discharge, and defamation. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Foy v. Bank of America

Corp., No. 5:04-cv-00944-FL (E.D.N.C. June 15, 2005; Feb. 21,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -