Foxx v. State

154 So. 912, 26 Ala. App. 146, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 69
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 15, 1934·No. 6 Div. 596.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

The jury’s verdict found appellant guilty under the first count of the indictment, which action operated as an acquittal of him under the second. There were but two counts in the indictment.

The first was in Code form for an offense under Code 1923, § 4131. Demurrers to it were properly overruled. Code 1923, § 4556, form 58.

If the inclusion of the second count, with the first, constituted a misjoinder of offenses rendering the indictment subject to the demurrers interposed on that ground, the action of the jury above noted caused any error in overruling said demurrers to be without injury to appellant.

The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and we can find no prejudicial error to have been committed.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foxx v. State, 154 So. 912, 26 Ala. App. 146, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 69 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

154 So. 912 (Foxx v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. State
365 So. 2d 1007 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Sanders v. State
179 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Whatley v. State
31 So. 2d 662 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Couch v. State
20 So. 2d 57 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1944)
Bradham v. State
170 So. 222 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1936)