Foxx v. J & C ENTERPRISES, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Foxx v. J & C ENTERPRISES, INC.

341 S.W.3d 192, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 2011 WL 1796405

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 10, 2011

DocketED 95384

StatusPublished

This text of 341 S.W.3d 192 (Foxx v. J & C ENTERPRISES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foxx v. J & C ENTERPRISES, INC., 341 S.W.3d 192, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 2011 WL 1796405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kristina Foxx (“Claimant”) appeals the decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) concluding that: (1) the Missouri Division of Employment Security deputy’s (“Division”) determinations that Claimant was disqualified and ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits were final because Claimant failed to file a timely appeal; and (2) Claimant was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. Claimant first argues that the Commission erred in finding that the Division’s determinations that she was disqualified and ineligible for benefits were final because she had “good cause” for filing an untimely appeal. Second, Claimant challenges the merits of the Division’s decision that Claimant was disqualified and ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. Finally, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the Commission did not err in concluding that the Division’s disqualification and ineligibility decisions were final and that Claimant was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kristina Foxx (“Claimant”) appeals the decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) concluding that: (1) the Missouri Division of Employment Security deputy’s (“Division”) determinations that Claimant was disqualified and ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits were final because Claimant failed to file a timely appeal; and (2) Claimant was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. Claimant first argues that the Commission erred in finding that the Division’s determinations that she was disqualified and ineligible for benefits were final because she had “good cause” for filing an untimely appeal. Second, Claimant challenges the merits of the Division’s decision that Claimant was disqualified and ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. Finally, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the Commission did not err in concluding that the Division’s disqualification and ineligibility decisions were final and that Claimant was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 S.W.3d 192, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 2011 WL 1796405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foxx-v-j-c-enterprises-inc-moctapp-2011.