Foxworth v. ST. AMAND
This text of 612 F.3d 705 (Foxworth v. ST. AMAND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For reasons elucidated in our earlier opinion in this appeal, see Foxworth v. St. Amand, 570 F.3d 414 (1st Cir.2009), as augmented by the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in response to our certified question, see Foxworth v. St. Amand,, 457 Mass. 200, 929 N.E.2d 286 (2010); see also Mass. S.J.C. R. 1:03, we reverse the decision of the district court and direct the entry of a judgment denying and dismissing the underlying habeas corpus petition. Each party shall bear his own costs.
The judgment is reversed and the habeas petition is denied and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F.3d 705, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15069, 2010 WL 2853723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foxworth-v-st-amand-ca1-2010.