Foxworth v. ST. AMAND

First Circuit

Foxworth v. ST. AMAND

612 F.3d 705, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15069, 2010 WL 2853723

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foxworth v. ST. AMAND. Read the opinion of the Court — 612 F.3d 705 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 22, 2010·No. 08-1751·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For reasons elucidated in our earlier opinion in this appeal, see Foxworth v. St. Amand, 570 F.3d 414 (1st Cir.2009), as augmented by the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in response to our certified question, see Foxworth v. St. Amand,, 457 Mass. 200, 929 N.E.2d 286 (2010); see also Mass. S.J.C. R. 1:03, we reverse the decision of the district court and direct the entry of a judgment denying and dismissing the underlying habeas corpus petition. Each party shall bear his own costs.

The judgment is reversed and the habeas petition is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For reasons elucidated in our earlier opinion in this appeal, see Foxworth v. St. Amand, 570 F.3d 414 (1st Cir.2009), as augmented by the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in response to our certified question, see Foxworth v. St. Amand,, 457 Mass. 200, 929 N.E.2d 286 (2010); see also Mass. S.J.C. R. 1:03, we reverse the decision of the district court and direct the entry of a judgment denying and dismissing the underlying habeas corpus petition. Each party shall bear his own costs.

The judgment is reversed and the habeas petition is denied and dismissed.

Foxworth v. ST. AMAND, 612 F.3d 705, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15069, 2010 WL 2853723 (1st Cir. 2010).

Pincite

612 F.3d 705 (Foxworth v. ST. AMAND) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related