Fox's Lessee v. Palmer

2 U.S. 214, 2 Dall. 214
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1793·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court:—

A subscribing witness attests nothing but the sealing and delivery of the deed: The date is a matter which he does not attest, and to which he seldom attends. By the rules of the Common Lav/, the fubferibing witneffes ihould be produced by the plaintiff to prove the execution of. the deed ; and furely it'would be their competent to the defendant to crofs-examine them, as to the real time of the delivery. But even if they were called to-contradict their own previous atteftation, the exception rather applies to their credit, than to their competency.

The objection over-ruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox's Lessee v. Palmer, 2 U.S. 214, 2 Dall. 214 (1793).

2 U.S. 214 (Fox's Lessee v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(HC) Nedd v. Bird
E.D. California, 2023
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad
271 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Anderson v. Myers
182 F. 223 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland, 1910)