Foxall v. Levi

District of Columbia

Foxall v. Levi

1 D.C. 139

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 139 (Foxall v. Levi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foxall v. Levi, 1 D.C. 139 (D.D.C. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon which the Couet refused to commit him in execution.

The summons was simply signed by the commissioners, stating themselves as such. There was also a certificate that he did attend yesterday at Baltimore agreeably to his summons. See the bankrupt law of the 4th of April, 1800, § 22, which declares that the bankrupt shall be free from arrest; and on producing the summons or notice under the hands of commissioners, shall be discharged, if arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon which the Couet refused to commit him in execution.

The summons was simply signed by the commissioners, stating themselves as such. There was also a certificate that he did attend yesterday at Baltimore agreeably to his summons. See the bankrupt law of the 4th of April, 1800, § 22, which declares that the bankrupt shall be free from arrest; and on producing the summons or notice under the hands of commissioners, shall be discharged, if arrested.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foxall-v-levi-dcd-1803.