Foxall v. Levi

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Foxall v. Levi

9 F. Cas. 644, 1 Cranch 139, 1803 U.S. App. LEXIS 337

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedAugust 6, 1803

DocketCase No. 5,015

StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. Cas. 644 (Foxall v. Levi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foxall v. Levi, 9 F. Cas. 644, 1 Cranch 139, 1803 U.S. App. LEXIS 337 (circtddc 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon which

THE COURT

refused to commit him in execution. The summons was simply signed by the commissioners, stating themselves as such. There was also a certificate that he did attend yesterday at Baltimore agreeably to his summons. See the bankrupt law of the 4th of April, 1800, § 22 [2 Stat 19], which declares That the bankrupt shall be free from arrest; and on producing the summons or notice under the hands of commissioners, shall be discharged, if arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon which

THE COURT

refused to commit him in execution. The summons was simply signed by the commissioners, stating themselves as such. There was also a certificate that he did attend yesterday at Baltimore agreeably to his summons. See the bankrupt law of the 4th of April, 1800, § 22 [2 Stat 19], which declares That the bankrupt shall be free from arrest; and on producing the summons or notice under the hands of commissioners, shall be discharged, if arrested.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 F. Cas. 644, 1 Cranch 139, 1803 U.S. App. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foxall-v-levi-circtddc-1803.