Fox v. State
This text of 356 S.W.3d 326 (Fox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Charles Scott Fox (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion because Mov-ant pleaded facts showing he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 S.W.3d 326, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501, 2011 WL 5362138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-state-moctapp-2011.